What AMW is

A warrant an owner signs and a contract enforces. It bounds what an autonomous agent may do with the owner's money — not one action at a time, which every platform already does, but across a sequence, which none of them do.

The problem it exists for

Nine swaps of 240,000 USDC under a 250,000 per-action cap. Every one satisfies the mandate. The aggregate reaches 2,160,000, and the ninth is held before it settles. Traditional finance criminalised that pattern as structuring fifty years ago; a per-action validator cannot see it by construction, because each action is fine.

That is the whole thesis: an unauthorised outcome, assembled entirely from authorised steps. An agent does not need to break a rule to reach a position its owner never sanctioned. It only needs to stay inside one, repeatedly.

Three properties everything else follows from

PropertyWhat it rules out
Enforcement lives in the contract, and nowhere else No model, service or screen can permit what the guard refuses. Nothing above the contract is trusted, so nothing above it needs to be
The agent can ask and cannot spend Zero balance, zero allowance, and the guard as sole approved spender. A stolen agent key moves nothing to itself, only within the mandate and back to the owner
A held action returns; it does not revert A revert would roll back the events and leave the hold with no trace. Supervision that erases its own record is not supervision

How the parts fit

Four layers, and the boundary between them is the product. Authority runs one way — down to the contract, never up from the agentic layer.

LayerDoesMay not
ContractsEvaluate every clause before settlement, hold what composes past a boundBe upgraded — there is no proxy, no admin key, no pause authority
Evidence spineRecord what the chain said; anchor a commitment per intentBe the authority. It is rebuildable from chain, and it is checked against the anchor
Supervisory crewInvestigate a hold and draft a case file whose every claim cites a recordOriginate a finding, hold a key, or release anything
ConsoleShow exposure, the epoch, the case, and take a named human's decisionSign. The authoriser signs from their own key; the server files nothing the chain does not show

What a firm actually changes

Two things. The owner approves the guard rather than the agent, and the agent calls requestAction instead of calling the venue directly. Nothing else about how the agent is built, hosted or scheduled changes — see Integrate an agent.

Where to go next